|
|||||||||||||
Taking
Life on the Web: A case report on three websites submitted to the E-HARD
providing suicide related Information Internet Health 2003;1:9 Vinod
Scaria Correspondence: Introduction: Case
Reports:
The
Church of Euthanasia, which describes to be set up on the four pillars of
suicide, abortion, cannibalism and sodomy, gives advice to kill yourself
to save the planet. The
website provides in-detail information on how to take one’s life using
Helium, complete with photographs on how to assemble the equipment. The
website also provides an exhaustive collection of links on how to procure
the needed equipments.
The Death
NET describes itself as the International archive specializing in all
aspects of death and dying. The website also provides a section called
Death MART and describes it as the art and science of dying. This section
offers a number of documents on how-to take one’s life. There is also a
hosted discussion group named Death TALK.
This
website gives in depth analysis and thorough and exhaustive information on
different modes of taking one’s life. Discussion: It should
be emphasized here that Internet being an anarchic media, has the
potential to provide information that would harm human lives. Though there
have been little evidence in the past few years about such information,
new evidence like that recently published in the Journal of Medical
Internet Research[3], testifying against the Satan Service website should
be taken into consideration. To
quantify the menace of such information on the Internet, we searched the
popular search engine Google[4] with the query string “how to suicide”
and returned with 153 URLs, and the websites described above seemed to
have good visibility as per the rank order. Though the number of such
websites seem to be low, the actual incidence of people using these
websites and the influence of these websites is not known. We hope
this report would significantly motivate people to submit evidence on such
information. Moreover prevention of spread of such information on the Net,
should be undertaken on a worldwide scale to curb the menace. References: 1]
E-Health Adversities Research Database. URL: http://www.cybermedicine.netfirms.com/ehard.html
2]Does
Internet Harm Health? Letters: BMJ 2002;324:238 ( 26 January )
http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/324/7331/238/a
3]
Athanaselis S, Stefanidou M, Karakoukis N, Koutselinis A 4]
Google URL: www.google.com accessed
on March 24th 2003 Competing Interests: The author maintains the E-Health Adversities Research Database on his website.
|
|||||||||||||
© Copyright of articles belongs to the respective authors. Verbatim copying, redistribution and storage of this article permitted provided no restrictions are imposed on the access and a hyperlink to the original article in Internet Health maintained. The author would be interested in critical appraisal of this article. Please contact him at the correspondence e-mail provided. All opinion stated in this article are exclusively that of the author(s). Internet Health takes no responsibility of articles published. Please read carefully the Terms and Conditions of use and disclaimer notice .Information in Internet health is not a substitute for your Physician's advice.
|